<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation &#038; the Web &#187; AdSense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danblank.com/blog/category/adsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danblank.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blogger Gives up AdSense Over Ethical Issues</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/12/20/blogger-gives-up-adsense-over-ethical-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/12/20/blogger-gives-up-adsense-over-ethical-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2007/12/20/blogger-gives-up-adsense-over-ethical-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darren Rowse points us to a post by a blogger who is giving up on using Google AdSense because of ethical issues.
Trent Hamm runs a website called The Simple Dollar, which gives financial advice for &#8220;people fighting debt and bad spending habits.&#8221; His issue with AdSense:

&#8220;&#8230;this automated bidding system allows anyone to bid, and I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/20/financial-blogger-abandons-adsense/" title="Financial Blogger Abandons AdSense">Darren Rowse</a> points us to a post by <a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/12/18/why-ive-decided-to-abandon-google-ads-on-the-simple-dollar/" title="Why I’ve Decided To Abandon (Virtually All) Ads On The Simple Dollar">a blogger who is giving up on using Google AdSense</a> because of ethical issues.
<p>Trent Hamm runs a website called The Simple Dollar, which gives financial advice for &#8220;people fighting debt and bad spending habits.&#8221; His issue with AdSense:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;&#8230;this automated bidding system allows anyone to bid, and I don’t have much control over who does the bidding. The end result was that the site would have ads from payday loan places, credit card brokerages, shady subprime lenders, and such.&#8221;
<p>&#8220;In the end, I finally realized that the real reason I write The Simple Dollar is to help bring about positive change in people’s lives, and when the site showed ads that really conflicted with that mission, I was undercutting what I want to do here.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>To me, this is another positive sign in the evolution of blogging and online journalism. While online media does not have standards and practices that have evolved over a century&#8217;s time like print media &#8211; decisions like Trent&#8217;s show its move in a positive direction. When a blogger will dramatically cut his personal income because of ethical issues over ads&#8230; it shortens the expanse from blogger to traditional journalist. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/12/20/blogger-gives-up-adsense-over-ethical-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Launches Video Ads</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/10/10/google-launches-video-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/10/10/google-launches-video-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2007/10/10/google-launches-video-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is now offering YouTube videos in it popular AdSense advertising network:

&#8220;We&#8217;re excited about the launch of video units &#8212; a new way to enrich your site with quality, relevant video content in an embedded, customizable player. Simply embed a snippet of code and have relevant YouTube partner content streamed to your site. You can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is now offering <a href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2007/10/introducing-video-units.html" title="Introducing Video Units">YouTube videos in it popular AdSense advertising network</a>:<br />
<blockquote>
&#8220;We&#8217;re excited about the launch of video units &#8212; a new way to enrich your site with quality, relevant video content in an embedded, customizable player. Simply embed a snippet of code and have relevant YouTube partner content streamed to your site. You can choose categories of video to target to your site, select content from individual YouTube partners, or have video automatically targeted to your site content.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/10/10/google-launches-video-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only Paying When You Receive: Google&#8217;s Pay-Per-Action</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/03/21/only-paying-when-you-receive-googles-pay-per-action/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/03/21/only-paying-when-you-receive-googles-pay-per-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2007/03/21/only-paying-when-you-receive-googles-pay-per-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is testing a new ad system, called pay-per-action. Unlike their currend AdWords system, in which advertisers pay for each time a user clicks on their ad, pay-per-action is described this way:

&#8220;Pay-per-action advertising is a new pricing model that allows you to pay only for completed actions that you define, such as a lead, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is testing a new ad system, called <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/03/pay-per-action-beta-test.html" title="Pay-per-action beta test">pay-per-action</a>. Unlike their currend AdWords system, in which advertisers pay for each time a user clicks on their ad, pay-per-action is described this way:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Pay-per-action advertising is a new pricing model that allows you to pay only for completed actions that you define, such as a lead, a sale, or a pageview, after a user has clicked on your ad on a publisher&#8217;s site.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>One of the reasons that pay-per-action is getting so much attention is that it would eliminate click fraud.
<p>Michael Arrington explains <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/21/digesting-googles-new-ppa-%20advertising-product/" title="Digesting Google’s New PPA Advertising Product">what Pay-per-action means to businesses</a> and to Google itself. Among his observations:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;This won’t affect big advertisers much, because they already track ROI on CPC advertising very closely. For smaller advertisers though, click fraud can wreak havoc. The ability to largely filter out click fraud will help them track ROI much more closely that they previously could. This will be a big help for them.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2007/03/21/only-paying-when-you-receive-googles-pay-per-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Excitement Grows Around Web Advertising, so do Costs</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/29/as-excitement-grows-around-web-advertising-so-do-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/29/as-excitement-grows-around-web-advertising-so-do-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 00:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/29/as-excitement-grows-around-web-advertising-so-do-costs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports: &#8220;Ad Costs on the Web Are Rising, but Perhaps a Bit Irrationally.&#8221;
&#8220;Prices for some online advertising are going up, and some retailers and brand marketers say the big question mark hanging over 2007 is whether publishers will be so emboldened by a strong advertising market that they will raise the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times reports: &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/25/technology/25ecom.html?ei=5088&amp;en=c4cec948363f4c98&amp;ex=1324702800&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&amp;adxnnlx=1167156240-ClsJ4qZ5F9Vd43oj+cHopw" title="Ad Costs on the Web Are Rising, but Perhaps a Bit Irrationally">Ad Costs on the Web Are Rising, but Perhaps a Bit Irrationally</a>.&#8221;
<p>&#8220;Prices for some online advertising are going up, and some retailers and brand marketers say the big question mark hanging over 2007 is whether publishers will be so emboldened by a strong advertising market that they will raise the prices of ads sharply.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/29/as-excitement-grows-around-web-advertising-so-do-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Advertising Growth at Google</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/online-advertising-growth-at-google/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/online-advertising-growth-at-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/online-advertising-growth-at-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Battelle points us to an interesting story from John Chow regarding Google&#8217;s pursuit of growth in online advertising via a new ad network:
&#8220;Google has been hand-selecting sites (no word on how many sites has been chosen) that they want to put in front of Fortune 1000 companies. The goal being to sell these big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/003133.php" title="">John Battelle</a> points us to an interesting story from John Chow regarding Google&#8217;s pursuit of growth in online advertising via a <a href="http://www.johnchow.com/google’s-top-secret-advertising-network/" title="Google’s Top Secret Advertising Network">new ad network</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;Google has been hand-selecting sites (no word on how many sites has been chosen) that they want to put in front of Fortune 1000 companies. The goal being to sell these big companies display and video ads at a very high CPM – unlike the AdSense network, the display network is 100% CPM based.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/online-advertising-growth-at-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of Online Advertising</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/the-state-of-online-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/the-state-of-online-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 14:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/the-state-of-online-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Karp takes an in depth look at the state of online advertising. He sees irony in a recent IAB campaign to convince advertisers to embrace the online medium:
&#8220;&#8230;the campaign uses the same concept of “engagement” that newspaper and magazines have used to promote their shrinking mediums.&#8221;
He references quite a number of issues being discussed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Karp takes an in depth look at the state of <a href="http://publishing2.com/2006/12/01/the-deeply-painful-growing-pains-of-online-advertising/" title="The Deeply Painful Growing Pains of Online Advertising">online advertising</a>. He sees irony in a recent IAB campaign to convince advertisers to embrace the online medium:
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the campaign uses the same concept of “engagement” that newspaper and magazines have used to promote their shrinking mediums.&#8221;
<p>He references quite a number of issues being discussed on the web right now, with this conclusion:
<p>&#8220;Online advertising will likely outgrow this phase and deliver a prosperous future — but we should have no illusions about how much pain there’s liable to be along the way.&#8221;
<p>Bloomberg reports on the outlook for <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601204&amp;sid=a5sOvk9gBMQI&amp;refer=technology" title="Media Industry Outlook Is Negative for 2007, Fitch Ratings Says ">media advertising</a> in 2007:
<p>&#8220;The ongoing shift in advertising dollars from traditional media into non-traditional media, most notably the Internet,&#8221; will affect broadcasters and entertainment companies as well&#8230;&#8221;
<p>Media Magazine shares their insight on the future of <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticleHomePage&amp;art_aid=51695" title="Bad News for Old News">media and the internet</a>:
<ul>
<li>Traditional media companies will struggle to maintain their audiences.
<li>More business models will emerge to reward independent content creators.
<li>TVs, computers, and other digital devices will truly begin to morph.
<li>Technology will make it easier to find, access, and manage content.
<li>Digital video will drive the growth of online advertising.
<li>Advertising in digital venues will become more contextual.
<li>Small-screen devices will have limited appeal as a media platform.
<li>Marketers will make some mistakes as they move into new digital spaces.
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/12/03/the-state-of-online-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Moves in on Niche Markets</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/24/google-moves-in-on-niche-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/24/google-moves-in-on-niche-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/24/google-moves-in-on-niche-markets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is launching a customized search tool, moving in on niche markets, where smaller players have tried to be the &#8220;Google&#8221; of a certain industry. From the Financial Times:
&#8220;By letting companies and individuals build their own specialised search engines, it will also create competition for the many new “vertical” search products that have recently been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a53ea278-62e9-11db-8faa-0000779e2340.html" title="Google unveils ‘custom’ searches">Google is launching a customized search tool</a>, moving in on niche markets, where smaller players have tried to be the &#8220;Google&#8221; of a certain industry. From the Financial Times:
<p>&#8220;By letting companies and individuals build their own specialised search engines, it will also create competition for the many new “vertical” search products that have recently been launched on the web, she added.&#8221;
<p>&#8220;Users of Google Custom Search Engine will be able to select the websites they want to be included in their searches, and add to this list in future by “tagging” websites they visit. Any searches will then return results just from that slice of the Google search index.&#8221;
<p>Rex Hammock talks about <a href="http://www.rexblog.com/2006/10/23/16136/" title="The* Google to announce narrow search tool for web publishers, bloggers">his experience with providing vertical search</a> prior to this announcement. On thing that is not clear about the new service is the search details that Google will provide. For example, in Rex&#8217;s current search method:
<p>&#8220;&#8230;we’ve garnered a vast amount of insight from analyzing the search patterns of our users&#8230;&#8221;
<p>Michael Arrington points out that while <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/23/google-custom-search-tomorrow/" title="Google Co-op Launches">Google&#8217;s service is not unique</a>, it is the first to:
<p>&#8220;&#8230;bundle the service with Google Adsense ads and share revenue with websites that embed the custom search engine into their site. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/24/google-moves-in-on-niche-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confusion: Online Ads, Web Metrics and RSS</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/18/confusion-online-ads-web-metrics-and-rss/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/18/confusion-online-ads-web-metrics-and-rss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web metrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/18/confusion-online-ads-web-metrics-and-rss/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think about this for awhile: &#8220;Google is projected to pocket a full quarter of US online advertising market in 2006.&#8221; Marketwatch and eMarketer also report on this story.
To help you get a piece of this pie, here are the Top 35 Most Profitable Keywords in AdSense system:
&#8220;Expensive keyword&#8221; (high CPC) isn&#8217;t equal to &#8220;profitable keyword&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about this for awhile: &#8220;<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/17/technology/google_ad_revenue/index.htm?section=money_technology" title="Google to grab huge share of online ad dollars">Google is projected to pocket a full quarter of US online advertising market in 2006</a>.&#8221; <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7BF446C6EE-8F77-4ACA-8C54-FD2916D8C818%7D" title="eMarketer">Marketwatch</a> and <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?1004206" title="A Bleak Year for US Marketers? ">eMarketer</a> also report on this story.
<p>To help you get a piece of this pie, here are the <a href="http://wisdom-of-adsense.org/?q=node/16" title="Top 35 Most Profitable Keywords in AdSense system">Top 35 Most Profitable Keywords in AdSense system</a>:
<p>&#8220;Expensive keyword&#8221; (high CPC) isn&#8217;t equal to &#8220;profitable keyword&#8221; (high earnings) due to the low volume of traffic expensive (niche) keywords produce. The best way to find really profitable keywords is to rank keywords by cost/day (cost per click X clicks/day) rather than cost per click. Almost all AdSense publishers are looking for the most expensive keywords. Let&#8217;s have a look at the top 100 most expensive keywords. But first let&#8217;s add 2 extra columns to the list: clicks/day and cost/day by Google AdWords estimation&#8230;&#8221;
<p>In other news, BusinessWeek reports on unreliable and confusing <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_43/b4006095.htm" title="What's Real? ">methods of measuring traffic online</a>.
<p>And just in case you aren&#8217;t depressed enough with the Google thing and the web metrics thing, here are <a href="http://www.hiveminds.co.uk/node/3139" title="5 Reasons Why RSS Feeds are Not Popular">5 Reasons Why RSS Feeds are Not Popular</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/10/18/confusion-online-ads-web-metrics-and-rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Click Fraud</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/22/click-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/22/click-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[click fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/22/click-fraud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Rubel pointed out a new BusinessWeek cover story on click fraud. The article looks at:
&#8220;&#8230;a dizzying collection of scams and deceptions that inflate advertising bills for thousands of companies of all sizes. The spreading scourge poses the single biggest threat to the Internet&#8217;s advertising gold mine and is the most nettlesome question facing Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="BusinessWeek Publishes Big Investigation on Click Fraud" href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/09/businessweek_pu.html">Steve Rubel</a> pointed out a new BusinessWeek cover story on <a title="The dark side of online advertising " href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_40/b4003001.htm">click fraud</a>. The article looks at:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;<font face="Arial">a dizzying collection of scams and deceptions that inflate advertising bills for thousands of companies of all sizes. The spreading scourge poses the single biggest threat to the Internet&#8217;s advertising gold mine and is the most nettlesome question facing Google and Yahoo, whose digital empires depend on all that gold.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial">While search engines have played down the scope of click fraud, BusinessWeek uncovered a </font><font face="Arial">&#8220;thriving click-fraud underground populated by swarms of small-time players.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial">Steve&#8217;s take on all of this:</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial">&#8220;My take on all of this is that advertising is clearly at a major crossroads. The old model of throwing stuff up there and seeing what sticks is dying. Search engine marketing, while certainly effective, can have its challenges too and clearly can be gamed. Over time, people are going to say &#8220;enough.&#8221; They&#8217;re going to want companies to engage them in conversation before they are convinced they should buy. This is why I believe we&#8217;re about to enter the golden age of PR. &#8220;</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial">One thing is for certain, while the web changes the way we publish, the way advertisers reach their audience, and the way people consume media &#8211; the web itself must evolve beyond the bubbly expectation that Google will save us all. The great thing about the web though, there is not shortage of watchdogs. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/22/click-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google AdSense in Email Newsletters</title>
		<link>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/21/google-adsense-in-email-newsletters/</link>
		<comments>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/21/google-adsense-in-email-newsletters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdSense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/21/google-adsense-in-email-newsletters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Search Engine Journal: &#8220;Google AdSense… seems to be letting select publishers serve Google AdSense ads in newsletters and mass commercial emailings. I’ve tried (as a test) placing Google AdSense in Constant Contact powered emails and the ads were served and targeted almost perfectly.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=3803">Search Engine Journal</a>: &#8220;Google AdSense… seems to be letting select publishers serve Google AdSense ads in newsletters and mass commercial emailings. I’ve tried (as a test) placing Google AdSense in Constant Contact powered emails and the ads were served and targeted almost perfectly.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danblank.com/blog/2006/09/21/google-adsense-in-email-newsletters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->